Every year, the Port State Control (PSC) selects a particular area of ship safety or environmental regulation for closer scrutiny as part of its Concentrated Inspection Campaign (CIC). This autumn, over September and November 2025, the focus will be on ballast water management. Inspectors under the Paris and Tokyo MoUs will be paying extra attention to how vessels handle, record, and report ballast operations.
For many shipowners, this will feel like another line on the compliance checklist but in reality, it’s a clear signal: regulators are shifting their attention from equipment and technical malfunctions alone to the way data is recorded, shared, and used in daily operations.
Chart of recent deficiencies in ballast water management, based on Paris Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) data.
Why record-keeping matters more than ever
Historically, most ballast water deficiencies flagged by inspectors haven’t come from failed systems, but from poor documentation. The Paris MoU’s latest figures show that well over half of recorded cases relate to record books – whether incomplete, inconsistent or missing entirely. DNV data from 2024–2025 confirms the same picture: administrative errors and inconsistent documentation are among the most frequent findings.
These aren’t minor oversights. A mismatch between what’s written in the logbook and what the BWMS shows in practice can lead to fines, detentions, or even delays in port entry. The problem is compounded by outdated reporting templates, fragmented digital records and the pressure crews face to keep up with a growing mountain of paperwork.
The new amendments adopted at MEPC 82 and 83 raise the bar further. Since February 2025, ballast water records must include more detailed information on maintenance, contingency actions during malfunctions, and crew familiarity with the system. MEPC 83 doubled down on this trajectory by reinforcing data reporting requirements across the board, from GHG emissions to ballast water handling, and creating a compliance landscape where paperwork and performance are increasingly inseparable. In this new era of regulations, shipowners need to reassess whether their current compliance solutions are fit for purpose , or if they’re the cause of errors and inefficiencies.
Tommi Vihavainen, Director, Development and Product Owner – Logbook, NAPA
Traditional record-keeping simply cannot keep pace. Paper logs are easily lost or damaged, handwritten entries are prone to error and misinterpretation, and even standalone digital logs often fall short if they aren’t kept up to date, validated against live operational data or are evaluated in silos.
The operational challenge for crews
Crews already juggle voyage planning, safety drills, emission reporting, and inspections. Adding complex ballast water documentation to the mix can compound workload pressures, especially when records are still maintained manually or on disconnected systems. Mistakes creep in, entries get missed and compliance gaps appear.
This is not just an administrative issue. Each discrepancy carries risk: costly delays, failed inspections, or reputational damage for owners. Further, the stress of keeping up with compliance admin work can distract people from what matters most – running safe and efficient operations.
The answer is to move towards integrated digital platforms that take much of the manual burden away from crews while ensuring data accuracy and consistency.
A digital solution with a human touch
Modern digital logbooks are more than electronic replacements for paper logbooks but they remain tools, rather than replacements, for people. Both human intelligence and digital solutions need to work in harmony to avoid costly detentions or delays.
Developed for and with seafarers, electronic logbooks, like NAPA Logbook, help simplify ballast water record-keeping and support environmental reporting, in line with regulations like MARPOL, EU-MRV, EU ETS, and IMO-DCS, to enable teams onshore and onboard to confidently comply with regulations. These e-logbooks guide crew in inputting the right information, ensure potential mistakes are flagged, and fields are automatically populated with data from onboard systems. This level of automation and standardization reduces administrative burden, ensures vessels remain inspection-ready and that what’s written in the logbook actually matches what the BWMS has been doing.
When integrated with shoreside platforms such as NAPA Fleet Intelligence, digital tools connect ship and shore to create a single source of truth. BWMS data becomes part of a wider compliance and performance ecosystem, enabling real-time sharing with technical managers and independent verifiers like DNV’s Emission Connect. This eliminates redundant data entry, shortens reporting cycles, and establishes a centralized repository for compliance documentation, emissions accounting, and strategic decision-making.
For crews, the benefits are immediate: less time spent filling out forms, more confidence that records meet requirements and reduced stress during inspections. For ship owners and managers, the payoff is fewer compliance risks and stronger operational resilience.
More than compliance
The 2025 PSC CIC sheds light on an uncomfortable truth: ballast water noncompliance is preventable. Compliance is ultimately about accountability and preparedness, and shipowners who adopt digital tools are not only future-proofing their operations but are also reducing risk, freeing up resources and enabling crews to focus on what matters most: operating safe and efficient vessels. At its heart, this is also a people-focused story. Streamlined compliance eases workload pressures and helps create a more manageable, fulfilling workplace for seafarers.
Source: By Tommi Vihavainen, Director of Development, NAPA