Sunday, 26 May 2019 | 22:10
SPONSORS
View by:

Benchmarking the Eagle Ford play

Wednesday, 24 April 2019 | 00:00

Our team of upstream experts regularly guide clients who need to gain a clear, concise and comprehensive view of why their investment is floundering. Lately, clients expressed growing concerns surrounding an under-performing operator in the Eagle Ford. Clients want to know why it has underperformed versus its peers and why debt is growing.

We’ve utilized Wood Mackenzie Well Evaluator to help our investor clients with peer benchmarking. Here’s a look at how we did it.

Step 1: We filtered for the criteria that best fit the operator’s acreage and drilling activities in the Eagle Ford
i) Hawkville Condensate and Maverick Condensate subplays

ii) Dimmit and Webb Counties

iii) Top 5 area operators

Step 2: Next, we refined the previous filter to only include completions from the last two years
This helped us narrow down the most recent production performance, which showed the operator’s assets are falling short compared with their nearest competitors.

Step 3: To further assess the damages in the operator’s performance, we decided to take a look under the hood of producers operating in the same areas
First we evaluated their well spacing – the bulk of their wells are on 660-foot spacing (4478/7 and 3957/6). To correct underperformance, the operator has promised to upspace wells to this level, so there’s hope that the corrective steps will improve their results.

Step 4: In the next step, we filtered down further into the operator’s corrective steps – are they actually working?
While some wells are now to 660-foot spacing (5788/9), the company continues to complete older sections that were drilled on 330-foot spacing (4034/11).

We drew up the results of the operator’s initial production (IP) per foot vs proppant per foot, in case the previous type-curve analysis didn’t fully reflect the new wells. The results weren’t promising – the operator’s performance is low compared with its closest competitors in the same region.

Step 5: In our final step we pondered – is geology to blame?
It’s possible. The nearest competitor’s acreage is in an area with higher total organic carbon (TOC) compared to that of the under-performing operator.

Wood Mackenzie Well Evaluator subsurface layers show Eagle Ford acreage TOC.

Well Evaluator’s new subsurface layers helped us dive into the TOC in the underperformer’s acreage. Its wells hit the hot red portion of the layer that shows TOC of <1.5%. That’s not a good sign for the operator.

Our conclusions? We are confident that the underperforming producer won’t make significant improvements in their well performance over current levels. We’ll continue to watch as fresh production data emerge to see if they can turn this ship around. For now, the data show a bleak outlook for the operator.
Source: Wood Mackenzie

Comments
    There are no comments available.
    Name:  
    Email:  
    Comment:  
     
    In order to send the form you have to type the displayed code.

     
SPONSORS

NEWSLETTER